| Summary: Ron Paul
asks Federal Reserve Bank chief, Ben Bernanke, if
there is any moral justification for devaluing our
currency. Dr. Paul contends that moral hazard begins
as soon as low interest rates are artificially created.
Dr. Paul notes that when new money is pumped into
our economy, the increased cost of living most heavily
impacts the poor.
Ron Paul: Thank you Mr. Chairman. I want to follow up on the
discussion about moral hazard. I think we have a
very narrow understanding about what moral hazard
really is. Because I think moral hazard begins at
the very moment that we create artificially low
interest rates, which we constantly do. And this
is the reason people we make mistakes. It isn't
because human nature causes us to make all these
mistakes. But there's a normal reaction when interest
rates are low that there will be overinvestment
and malinvestment excessive debt and then there
are consequences from this. My question is going
to be around the subject of how can it ever be morally
justifiable to deliberately depreciate the value
of our currency? And that is what we do constantly.
We are in the midst of a crisis today, and the efforts
have been directed towards propping up financial
markets and Wall Street. First, the crisis is noticed,
there is a panic, we dump in tens of billions of
dollars into reserves and that reassures the market.
Wall Street feels a little better and it's still
not enough. Then we take a discount window and we
lower the rates and we don't look at our problem
from what caused it but we say does this make it
a door and open up and lower the rates and again,
Wall Street says, oh this is wonderful. Do the poor
people like this? And do they respond? And is this
going to help them get houses? When some of them
couldn't even afford a house because even with the
low interest rates that were available because the
costs are going up and costs go up because the dollar
goes down. Then even this week, what did we do?
Our Federal Reserve lowers the interest rate by
50 points and the poor people and the middle class
people say boy, this is wonderful, my cost of living
is going to go down and I'm going to get a job.
No! Wall Street goes up 350 points. So it looks
like everything is directed toward a bailout. Whether
it is done deliberately or not, the American people
see this as a deliberate bailout of the financial
markets. The poor people are losing their houses.
Every sincere effort is made to try and correct
this, but it's inevitable that it's not going to
work because the monetary system and such, that
there is so much misinformation. We talk about market
discipline. It was indicate as chairman that we
didn't have enough market discipline. But there's
no possibility to have market discipline when all
of the information is erroneous. Today, with this
concept and during this testimony we see oil pricings
soaring, over $82 dollars a barrel. We see wheat
and corn soaring; we see other commodities' pricing
soaring-gold, $730, $740 an ounce. There is a great
deal of concern out there this is all reflecting
the fact that the dollar is going down in value
and if we don't deal with that, we can't solve the
problem. And we look at this and think, well, we've
created all these problems, because we've had this
malinvestment, all this credit going into the system
and we have all this correction that needs to come
about and we think we can solve the problem of inflation
with more inflation. But really the bottom line
is-what moral justification do we have to deliberately
devalue the currency and the dollars that people
save? This pushes the cost of living up for the
people that don't even have the chance to buy a
house. There's a moral consequence of the system
that we have today. And I can't see how we can avoid
this moral obligation we have. The responsibility
of the Congress should be to maintain the value
of the currency not deliberately tax the people
by creating new money and passing on the high cost
of living to the people who can least afford it.
Wall Street never suffers from that. And we still
of what we know of these things out in the open
that the Federal Reserve does but we don't know
the details of what the working group and financial
markets do to prop up markets, because I'm sure
they're very busy and have been very busy in these
last several months But is there any moral justification
for devaluing the currency?
Ben Bernanke: Thank
you Congressman. The value of the currency can also
be expressed in terms of what it can buy in domestic
goods. That is the domestic federal inflation rate.
That is part of the Federal Reserve's mandate, which
is to maintain price stability. Which, to my mind,
means the value of the dollar. The inflation rate
is something we pay close attention, we continue
to pay close attention to. But over the last year,
it's been a little over 2%. We will continue to
pay very close attention to the inflation rate.
It's an important part of our mandate and I agree
with you, that an economy cannot grow in a healthy
stable way when inflation is out of control and
we will certainly make sure that that doesn't happen.
|